Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
1.
Rev. cuba. pediatr ; 952023. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1515291

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El síndrome de torsión se incluye dentro de los síndromes que causan abdomen agudo quirúrgico. Como causa poco frecuente de este síndrome se encuentra la torsión esplénica en bazos que tienen anomalía en su fijación. Objetivo: Informar sobre la evolución de una paciente tratada por torsión de un bazo errante. Presentación del caso: Paciente de ocho años de edad, femenina, de color no blanco de la piel, con antecedentes de dolor abdominal crónico recurrente, que acudió al Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital Pediátrico de Cienfuegos Paquito González Cueto con dolor abdominal agudo, intermitente, de 48 horas de evolución, vómitos, abdomen doloroso a la palpación profunda en cuadrante superior izquierdo y masa palpable en flanco lateral del mismo lado de tres cm. Se sospechó una torsión esplénica. Se realizó, como complementario diagnóstico ultrasonido abdominal Doppler y tomografía contrastada de abdomen. Se hizo laparotomía y se encontró bazo torcido, con cambios de coloración por la isquemia, que recuperó su color normal después de la destorsión. Se fijó el órgano a la pared abdominal. La evolución posquirúrgica resultó satisfactoria. Conclusiones: La torsión esplénica, aunque infrecuente, debe sospecharse en pacientes con dolor intermitente y masa palpable, principalmente en flanco lateral izquierdo. La tomografía contrastada resulta el examen diagnóstico de elección y se requiere de un diagnóstico temprano para poder conservar el bazo, órgano muy importante para una mejor función inmunológica en los niños(AU)


Introduction: Torsion syndrome is included among the syndromes causing acute surgical abdomen. A rare cause of this syndrome is splenic torsion in spleens with abnormal fixation. Objective: To report on the evolution of a patient treated for torsion of an errant spleen. Case presentation: Eight-year-old female patient, non-white skin color, with a history of recurrent chronic abdominal pain, who attended the Emergency Department of the Paquito González Cueto Pediatric Hospital of Cienfuegos with intermittent acute abdominal pain of 48 hours of evolution, vomiting, painful abdomen on deep palpation in the left upper quadrant and palpable mass in the lateral flank of the same side measuring three centimeters. Splenic torsion was suspected. Doppler abdominal ultrasound and contrasted tomography of the abdomen were performed as a complementary diagnosis. Laparotomy was performed and the spleen was found to be twisted, with changes in color due to ischemia, which recovered its normal color after detorsion. The organ was fixed to the abdominal wall. The postoperative evolution was satisfactory. Conclusions: Splenic torsion, although rare, should be suspected in patients with intermittent pain and palpable mass, mainly in the left lateral flank. Contrast tomography is the diagnostic test of choice and early diagnosis is required to preserve the spleen, a very important organ for better immune function in children(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , Spleen/surgery , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Wandering Spleen/diagnosis
2.
Rev.chil.ortop.traumatol. ; 63(2): 87-92, ago.2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1436086

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN La infección periprotésica (IPP) es una de las complicaciones más serias en una artroplastia total de rodilla (ATR). Pese a esto, existe poca literatura chilena respecto de esta patología. OBJETIVOS Determinar la incidencia, las comorbilidades, los microorganismos aislados y su susceptibilidad antibiótica, y la morbimortalidad en pacientes con IPP. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS Estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo en pacientes operados entre 2001 y 2020 por gonartrosis, con una ATR primaria, en un mismo centro de salud, con al menos 1 año de seguimiento. Se excluyeron pacientes operados en otros centros o con registros clínicos incompletos. Se registraron las comorbilidades, los microorganismos aislados, la susceptibilidad antibiótica, y la sobrevida por medio de una búsqueda sistemática de las fichas clínicas de los pacientes con IPP. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva para presentar los datos. RESULTADOS Se incluyeron 544 ATRs, de las cuales 8 (1,47%) presentaron IPP, y los pacientes tenían una edad promedio de presentación de 66 (±5,7) años, e índice de masa corporal (IMC) promedio de 30,3 (±4,5) kg/m2. La mediana de tiempo de presentación de la IPP fue de 411 (±1.034) días. Las principales comorbilidades registradas fueron hipertensión arterial en 5 (62,5%), tabaquismo en 4 (50%) casos, y dislipidemia in 4 (50%) casos. En total, 5 (62,5%) pacientes presentaron etiología polimicrobiana, y en 3 (37,5%) se aisló un solo microorganismo. Los principales agentes aislados fueron Staphylococcus aureus y Staphylococcus coagulasa negativo, ambos multirresistentes, en 6 (75%) y 3 (37,5%) pacientes respectivamente. Todos los pacientes recibieron tres dosis de cefazolina como profilaxis quirúrgica. Se describe una sensibilidad del 100% frente a vancomicina y rifampicina (12/12 cultivos), y una resistencia del 83,4% al ciprofloxacino (4/9 cultivos). Un total de 2 (25%) pacientes fallecieron después de 3 años de la ATR por causas no relacionadas con la IPP. No hubo casos de recidiva infecciosa tras la revisión. CONCLUSIÓN Se encontró una incidencia de 1,47% (8 casos) de IPP. Todos los pacientes con IPP presentaron alguna comorbilidad prequirúrgica. Los principales agentes microbiológicos identificados fueron multirresistentes y susceptibles a vancomicina y rifampicina.


INTRODUCTION Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is one of the most serious complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite this, there is little Chilean literature regarding this pathology. OBJETIVES To determine the incidence, comorbidities, isolated microorganisms and their antibiotic susceptibility, morbidity, and mortality in patients with PPI. MATERIALS AND METHODS A descriptive and retrospective study in patients operated between 2001 and 2020 for gonarthrosis, with a primary TKA, in the same health center, with at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients operated on in other centers or with incomplete clinical records were excluded. Comorbidities, isolated microorganisms, antibiotic susceptibility, and survival were recorded through a systematic search of the clinical records of patients with PPI. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. RESULTS We included 544 TKAs, 8 (1.47%) of which presented PPI, and the patients had an average age at presentation of 66 years ( 5.7 years) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 30.3 ( 4, 5) kg/m2 . The median time of presentation of the PPI was of 411 ( 1,034) days. The main comorbidities recorded were arterial hypertension in 5 (62.5%), smoking in 4 (50%) cases, and dyslipidemia in 4 (50%) cases. In total, 5 (62.5%) patients presented polymicrobial etiology, and in 3 (37.5%), a single microorganism was isolated. The main isolated agents were Staphylococcus aureus and coagulasenegative Staphylococcus, both multidrug-resistant, in 6 (75%) and 3 (37.5%) patients respectively. All patients received three doses of cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis. A sensitivity of 100% to vancomycin and rifampicin (12/12 cultures), and a resistance of 83.4% to ciprofloxacin (4/9 cultures) were described. Overall, 2 (25%) patients died 3 years after the TKA, due to causes unrelated to PPI. There were no cases of infectious relapse after the review. CONCLUSION An incidence of 1.47% (8 cases) of PPI was found. All patients with PPI presented some presurgical comorbidity. The main microbiological agents identified were multidrug-resistant and susceptible to vancomycin and rifampicin


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Comorbidity , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Chile/epidemiology , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Incidence , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Rev. urug. cardiol ; 37(1): e701, jun. 2022. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1390036

ABSTRACT

La endocarditis infecciosa es una patología heterogénea con una alta mortalidad y requiere tratamiento quirúrgico en al menos la mitad de los casos. Cuando asienta en posición mitral, la reparación valvular en lugar de su sustitución, si bien representa un desafío técnico, ha ido ganando terreno en los últimos años. Describimos el caso de un paciente que se presentó con una endocarditis sobre válvula nativa mitral en quien se realizó una plastia valvular exitosa. Revisaremos la evidencia acerca de su beneficio.


Infective endocarditis is a heterogeneous disease with a high mortality and that requires surgical treatment in at least half of cases. When seated in mitral position, valve repair rather than replacement, while technically challenging, has been gaining popularity in recent years. We describe the case of a patient who presented with a mitral valve endocarditis in whom a successful valve repair was performed. Evidence supporting its use will be reviewed.


A endocardite infecciosa é uma doença heterogênea com alta mortalidade que requer tratamento cirúrgico em pelo menos metade dos casos. Quando sentado na posição mitral, o reparo da válvula, em vez da substituição da válvula, embora seja um desafio técnico, tem ganhado espaço nos últimos anos. Descrevemos o caso de um paciente que apresentou endocardite valvar mitral nativa, no qual foi realizada plastia valvar com sucesso. Vamos revisar as evidências sobre o seu benefício.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnostic imaging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/microbiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/drug therapy , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging
4.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 430-436, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | SES-SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1136238

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy of cefazolin sodium pentahydrate combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of open fracture complicated with soft tissue injury. METHODS Sixty-three patients with open fracture complicated with soft tissue injury were divided into observation (n = 33) and control (n = 30) groups. After surgical reduction, fixation, and repair of the fractures, the control group was treated with VSD for 10 days, and the observation group was treated with cefazolin sodium pentahydrate based on VSD for 10 days. The infection control time was recorded. After treatment, the pain of patients was evaluated. Before and after treatment, the serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and glucose were detected. After 6 months of treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment was evaluated. RESULTS The infection control time and Visual Analogue Scale score after treatment in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). After the treatment, the serum levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and glucose in each group were significantly lower than before the treatment (P < 0.05), and each index in observation was significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of open fractures complicated with soft tissue injury, cefazolin sodium pentahydrate combined with VSD can effectively reduce inflammation and stress, thus improving the treatment efficacy.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Investigar a eficácia clínica do cefazolin penta-hidrato de sódio combinado com drenagem por vedação a vácuo (VSD) no tratamento da fratura exposta complicada com lesão nos tecidos moles. MÉTODOS Sessenta e três doentes com fratura exposta complicada com lesões nos tecidos moles foram divididos em grupos de observação (n=33) e controle (n=30). Após redução cirúrgica, fixação e reparação da fratura, o grupo de controle foi tratado com VSD durante dez dias e o grupo de observação foi tratado com cefazolina penta-hidrato de sódio com base no VSD durante dez dias. O tempo de controle de infecção foi gravado. Após o tratamento, a dor dos doentes foi avaliada. Antes e após o tratamento, foram detectados os níveis séricos de proteína C-reativa (CRP), interleucina (IL)-6, IL -8, fator de necrose tumoral alfa (TNF-α), cortisol, epinefrina, norepinefrina e glicose. Após seis meses de tratamento, a taxa efetiva total de tratamento foi avaliada. RESULTADOS O tempo de controle da infecção e a pontuação da Escala Visual Analógica após o tratamento no grupo de observação foram significativamente inferiores ao do grupo de controle, respectivamente (P<0,05). Após o tratamento, os níveis séricos de CRP, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, cortisol, epinefrina, norepinefrina e glicose em cada grupo foram significativamente menores do que antes do tratamento, respectivamente (P<0,05), e cada índice de observação foi significativamente inferior ao do grupo de controle (P<0,05). CONCLUSÃO No tratamento da fratura exposta complicada com lesões nos tecidos moles, o cefazolin penta-hidrato de sódio combinado com VSD pode efetivamente reduzir a inflamação e o estresse, melhorando assim a eficácia do tratamento.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Soft Tissue Injuries , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Fractures, Open/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Wound Healing , Drainage , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev. medica electron ; 41(3): 748-755, mayo.-jun. 2019. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1094082

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La hernia de Spiegel es un defecto raro de la pared abdominal. Su diagnóstico se hace muy difícil por lo infrecuente y por la dificultad para diferenciarla de la hernia inguinal supravesical. Precisamente, por lo poco común, los médicos muchas veces no valoran seriamente la presencia de esta variedad de hernia. Constituye una patología en la que el diagnóstico al igual que el resto de las hernias de la pared abdominal, es esencialmente clínico. El objetivo de este trabajo es informar un caso con un tipo de hernia poco común. Paciente de 50 años de edad, de color de piel blanca, obesa, multípara de procedencia urbana, con antecedentes personales patológico de relativa buena salud. Acudió a consulta por presentar dolor en la región inferior derecha, en la unión del flanco derecho con el mesogastrio, desde hacía varios meses. Fue diagnosticada con una hernia de Spiegel. Se le realizaron los estudios correspondientes fue intervenida quirúrgicamente realizándose hernioplastia.


ABSTRACT Spiegelian hernia is a rare defect of the abdominal wall. Its diagnosis is very difficult because of its infrequency and the difficult of differentiating it from the supravesical inguinal hernia. Precisely due to its infrequence the doctors usually do not seriously evaluate the presence of this kind of hernia. It is a pathology in which, like in the rest of the abdominal wall hernias, the diagnosis is essentially clinical. The aim of this work is to report a case of a patient with an uncommon kind of hernia: a female, obese, multiparous, white patient, aged 50 years, from urban precedence, with personal pathological antecedents of relatively good health, assisted the consultation presenting pain in the right inferior region, in the place where the right flank meets the mesogastrium for several months. She was diagnosed a Spiegel's hernia. The correspondent studies were carried out and she underwent a hernioplasty.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Surgical Mesh , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Hernia, Abdominal/surgery , Hernia, Abdominal/diagnosis , Hernia, Abdominal/etiology , Hernia, Abdominal/blood , Hernia, Abdominal/epidemiology , Hernia, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Herniorrhaphy , Pain/diagnosis , Polypropylenes , Hemostasis
6.
Mem. Inst. Invest. Cienc. Salud (Impr.) ; 17(1): 16-24, abr. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDNPAR | ID: biblio-1007865

ABSTRACT

Las úlceras corneales de origen infeccioso son una emergencia oftalmológica que amenaza la visión y la integridad estructural del ojo, causando ceguera en 1,5 a 2 millones de casos al año por lo que requiere tratamiento inmediato. El objetivo fue determinar el patrón epidemiológico, factores de riesgo y efectividad del tratamiento en pacientes con úlcera corneal en la Fundación Visión en el periodo 2015-2017. Estudio de cohorte prospectivo donde se evaluó 53 pacientes con úlcera corneal de causa infecciosa que consultaron en la Fundación Visión en el periodo 2015-2017, y tuvieron un seguimiento mínimo de 4 meses. Se encontró un predominio del sexo masculino (69,8%), edad 45-65 años (49,1%), casados (54,7%), de condición socioeconómica baja (56,6%), agricultores (26,4%), con antecedente de traumatismo corneal (69,8%) o uso de lentes de contacto (17%). El agente etiológico fue bacteriano en el 49,1% y micótico en el 37,7%; para los de origen bacteriano el tratamiento más empleado fueron colirios fortificados de Cefazolina + Gentamicina y Natamicina/Fluconazol en caso de ser micótico. La evolución fue favorable en 90,9% y 80,0% de los bacterianos y micóticos, respectivamente. Los grupos de riesgo detectados fueron pacientes varones, agricultores, de condición socioeconómica baja, con antecedente de traumatismo corneal o uso de lentes de contacto. La efectividad del tratamiento utilizado fue mayor al 80%, siendo en su mayoría patógenos bacterianos(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Corneal Ulcer/drug therapy , Corneal Ulcer/epidemiology , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Visual Acuity , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Corneal Ulcer/microbiology , Natamycin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Keratitis/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use
7.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 83(6): 619-626, Nov.-Dec. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889326

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Antibiotics are frequently used for the treatment of rhinosinusitis. Concerns have been raised regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics and growing resistance. The lack of development of new antibiotic compounds has increased the necessity for exploration of non-antibiotic compounds that have antibacterial activity. Amlodipine is a non-antibiotic compound with anti-inflammatory activity. Objective: In this study we aimed to investigate the potential role of amlodipine in the treatment of rhinosinusitis by evaluating its effects on tissue oxidative status, mucosal histology and inflammation. Methods: Fifteen adult albino guinea pigs were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and treated with saline, cefazolin sodium, or amlodipine for 7 days. The control group was composed by five healthy guinea pigs. Animals were sacrificed after the treatment. Histopathological changes were identified using Hematoxylin-Eosin staining. Inflammation was assessed by Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte infiltration density. Tissue levels of antioxidants (superoxide dismutase, glutathione) and an oxidative product (malondialdehyde) were determined. Results: In rhinosinusitis induced animals, amlodipine reduced loss of cilia, lamina propria edema and collagen deposition compared to placebo (saline) and although not superior to cefazolin, amlodipine decreased polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration. The superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione levels were reduced, whereas the malondialdehyde levels were increased significantly in all three-treatment groups compared to the control group. Amlodipine treated group showed significantly increased superoxide dismutase and glutathione levels and decreased malondialdehyde levels compared to all treatment groups. Conclusion: The non-antibiotic compound amlodipine may have a role in acute rhinosinusitis treatment through tissue protective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.


Resumo Introdução: Antibióticos são frequentemente usados para o tratamento de rinossinusite. Questões têm sido levantadas sobre os efeitos adversos dos antibióticos e a resistência crescente. A falta de desenvolvimento de novos compostos antibióticos aumentou a necessidade da exploração de compostos não antibióticos que têm atividade antibacteriana. A amlodipina é um composto não antibiótico com atividade anti-inflamatória. Objetivo: O objetivo desse estudo foi investigar o papel potencial da amlodipina no tratamento da rinossinusite, avaliando seus efeitos sobre o estado oxidativo do tecido, histologia da mucosa e inflamação. Método: Quinze cobaias albinas adultas foram inoculadas com Staphylococcus aureus e tratadas com solução salina, cefazolina ou amlodipina durante sete dias. O grupo controle incluiu cinco cobaias saudáveis. Os animais foram sacrificados após o tratamento. Alterações histopatológicas foram identificadas com a coloração de hematoxilina-eosina. A inflamação foi avaliada pela densidade de infiltração de leucócitos polimorfonucleares. Foram determinados os níveis teciduais de antioxidantes (superóxido dismutase, glutationa) e um produto de oxidação (malondialdeído). Resultados: Em animais com rinossinusite induzida, a amlodipina reduziu a perda dos cílios, edema da lâmina própria e deposição de colágeno em comparação com o grupo placebo (solução salina) e embora não seja superior à cefazolina, a amlodipina diminuiu a infiltração de leucócitos polimorfonucleares. Os níveis de atividade da superóxido dismutase e glutationa foram reduzidos, enquanto os níveis de malondialdeído aumentaram significativamente nos três grupos de tratamento em comparação ao grupo controle. O grupo tratado com amlodipina apresentou aumento significante dos níveis de superóxido dismutase e glutationa e diminuição dos níveis de malondialdeído em comparação com todos os grupos de tratamento. Conclusão: O composto não antibiótico amlodipina pode ter um papel no tratamento da rinossinusite aguda através de mecanismos protetores de tecido, antioxidantes e anti-inflamatórios.


Subject(s)
Animals , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Amlodipine/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Reference Values , Staphylococcus aureus , Superoxide Dismutase/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Random Allocation , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Glutathione/analysis , Glutathione/drug effects , Guinea Pigs , Malondialdehyde/analysis , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Nasal Mucosa/pathology
8.
Clinics ; 70(6): 419-422, 06/2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-749786

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pilon fracture is a complex injury that is often associated with severe soft tissue damage and high rates of surgical site infection. The goal of this study was to analyze and identify independent risk factors for surgical site infection among patients undergoing surgical fixation of a pilon fracture. METHODS: The medical records of all pilon fracture patients who underwent surgical fixation from January 2010 to October 2012 were reviewed to identify those who developed a surgical site infection. Then, we constructed univariate and multivariate logistic regressions to evaluate the independent associations of potential risk factors with surgical site infection in patients undergoing surgical fixation of a pilon fracture. RESULTS: A total of 519 patients were enrolled in the study from January 2010 to October 2012. A total of 12 of the 519 patients developed a surgical site infection, for an incidence of 2.3%. These patients were followed for 12 to 29 months, with an average follow-up period of 19.1 months. In the final regression model, open fracture, elevated postoperative glucose levels (≥125 mg/dL), and a surgery duration of more than 150 minutes were significant risk factors for surgical site infection following surgical fixation of a pilon fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Open fractures, elevated postoperative glucose levels (≥125 mg/dL), and a surgery duration of more than 150 minutes were related to an increased risk for surgical site infection following surgical fixation of a pilon fracture. Patients exhibiting the risk factors identified in this study should be counseled regarding the possible surgical site infection that may develop after surgical fixation. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Young Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fractures, Open/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Open/complications , Hyperglycemia/complications , Medical Records , Multivariate Analysis , Operative Time , Postoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Tibial Fractures/complications , Tibial Fractures/drug therapy
9.
Cienc. enferm ; 20(2): 103-115, ago. 2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-724781

ABSTRACT

Este estudo objetiva analisar a profilaxia antimicrobiana no perioperatório de cirurgias limpas, em um hospital universitário do Centro-Oeste brasileiro. Estudo transversal descritivo, realizado em 700 prontuários de pacientes maiores ou igual a 18 anos, submetidos a procedimento cirúrgico limpo entre 2008 a 2010. Utilizou-se formulário estruturado e previamente avaliado. Para análise dos dados foram computados dois indicadores: a profilaxia antimicrobiana em até uma hora antes da incisão cirúrgica e a profilaxia antimicrobiana até 24 horas no pós-operatório, além das variáveis: antimicrobiano de escolha; dose de acordo com o peso do paciente e doses adicionais (repique) no intraoperatório, em cirurgias com tempo superior a 4 horas. Foram considerados os registros de até 30 dias após o procedimento cirúrgico ou de 12 meses nos casos de implantes de próteses e similares. Verificou-se que 86,6 por cento receberam profilaxia antimicrobiana, em 75,1 por cento, a primeira dose obedeceu ao tempo preconizado e em 96,9 por cento, o antimicrobiano de escolha foi a Cefazolina. Houve inadequação em 70,6 por cento quanto à duração da profilaxia, 96,8 por cento dose de acordo com o peso e 70 por cento das doses adicionais. A taxa de infecção do sítio cirúrgico foi de 10 por cento, sendo o Staphylococcus aureus resistente à Meticilina, o agente etiológico mais frequente. Apesar das diretrizes referirem cautela quanto à profilaxia antimicrobiana, o estudo mostrou inadequações que podem trazer prejuízos para a segurança dos pacientes.


The purpose of this study was to analyze preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean surgery, at a university hospital in Centre-West Brazil. This cross-sectional, descriptive study was completed using 700 records of patients 18 years of age or older undergoing clean surgery between 2008 and 2010. The study used a previously evaluated, structured form for data collection. Two indicators were analyzed: antimicrobial prophylaxis within one hour of incision, and antimicrobial prophylaxis 24 hours postoperatively, considering the following variables: antimicrobial selected; dose according to the weight of the patient, additional doses during surgery, and surgical procedures taking longer than four hours. Records completed within 30 days of the surgical procedure were considered, 12 months in cases of prosthetic implants and like ones. It was found that 86.6 percent had received antimicrobial prophylaxis, in 75.1 percent, the first dose was administered within the recommended timeframe, and in 96.9 percent, the antibiotic of choice was Cefazolin. Inadequacies were present in 70.6 percent for duration of prophylaxis, 96.8 percent in the dose according to the weight, and 70 percent in additional doses. The rate of surgical site infection was 10 percent, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common etiologic agent. Despite guidelines that advise caution with regard to antimicrobial prophylaxis, the study found inadequacies that may negatively impact patient safety.


Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la profilaxis antimicrobiana en el perioperatorio de cirugías limpias en un hospital clínico de la región Centro-Oeste de Brasil. Estudio transversal descriptivo, realizado en 700 historiales de pacientes mayores de 18 años, sometidos a procedimientos quirúrgicos limpios entre 2008 y 2010. Se utilizó un formulario estructurado y previamente validado. Para analizar los datos fueron calculados dos indicadores: profilaxis antimicrobiana hasta antes de una hora de la incisión quirúrgica, y profilaxis antimicrobiana hasta 24 horas del postoperatorio, además de las siguientes variables: antibiótico elegido; dosis de acuerdo con el peso del paciente; dosis adicionales en el intraoperatorio, en cirugías de duración mayor a 4 horas. Fueron considerados los registros de hasta 30 días después del procedimiento quirúrgico, o 12 meses en los casos de implantes de prótesis o similares. Se verificó que el 86,6 por ciento de los pacientes recibió profilaxis antimicrobiana; en el 75,1 por ciento de los pacientes la primera dosis obedeció al tiempo recomendado; y en el 96,9 por ciento de los casos, el antibiótico elegido fue Cefazolina. Hubo disconformidades en el 70,6 por ciento de los pacientes en cuando a la duración de la profilaxis, en el 96,8 por ciento respecto a la dosis de acuerdo con el peso y en el 70 por ciento de las dosis adicionales. La tasa de infección en el sitio quirúrgico fue de 10 por ciento, siendo el Staphylococcus aureus resistente a la Meticilina, el agente etiológico más frecuente. A pesar de que las directrices indican cuidado en cuanto a la profilaxis antimicrobiana, el estudio mostró disconformidades que pueden provocar perjuicios en la seguridad de los pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Perioperative Care/nursing , Brazil , Perioperative Nursing , Quality Indicators, Health Care
10.
Horiz. méd. (Impresa) ; 14(3): 37-43, jul. 2014. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-732067

ABSTRACT

Determinar la efectividad de la dosis única comparada con la dosis triple de Cefazolina como profilaxis antibiótica para reducir las infecciones post-cesárea. Material y Métodos: Estudio observacional, analítico, retrospectivo, transversal y comparativo. Se incluyó 82 historias clínicas de pacientes sometidas a cesárea en el Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen que recibieron dosis única o dosis triple de Cefazolina en el año 2011. De acuerdo al esquema recibido, se evaluaron las complicaciones infecciosas. Resultados: No hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre la dosis única y la dosis triple en la incidencia de infecciones totales (9,3% vs 16,4%, p= 0,422), infección del sitio operatorio (7% vs 12,8%, p= 0,793), endometritis (0% vs 2,6%, p= 1,116) e infección del tracto urinario (2,3% vs 0%, p= 0,918). Conclusión: La dosis única de Cefazolina como profilaxis antibiótica fue igual de efectiva como la dosis triple en la prevención de la morbilidad infecciosa post-cesárea...


To compare the effectiveness of single dose versus triple dose of Cefazolinas prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section. Material and Methods: An observational, analytic, retrospective, cross sectional comparative study. Eighty two medical records of women undergoing caesarean section who received either single dose or triple dose in the Almenara Irigoyen Hospital were included. Women were compared on the basis of development of postoperative infections. Results: The study groups did not have statistically significant differences in the incidence of total infections (9,3% vs 16,4%, p= 0,422), wound infections(7% vs 12,8%, p= 0,793), endometritis (0% vs 2,6%, p= 1,116) and urinary tract infection(2,3% vs 0%, p= 0,918). Conclusion: A single prophylaxis dose of Cefazolin was as effective as triple dose in preventing post-caesarean infectious morbidity...


Subject(s)
Humans , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Observational Study , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies
11.
Lima; s.n; 2013. 49 p. tab, graf.
Thesis in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: biblio-1113357

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Determinar si el uso de Cefazolina más azitromicina es más eficaz que Cefazolina para reducir las tasas de infección puerperal, incluyendo endometritis e infección de herida operatoria en pacientes sometidas a cesárea de emergencia en el Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolomé en el periodo diciembre 2010 a mayo 2011. Material y métodos: Se diseñó un estudio de cohorte donde 92 pacientes recibieron doble antibiótico, (azitromicina 1 gr vo. + Cefazolina 1 g ev.), y 91 pacientes la terapia estándar de la institución (1g Cefazolina ev.). Se recopilaron los datos relevantes al alta de los pacientes en una ficha creada para tal fin; siendo estos posteriormente procesados con ayuda del programa SPSS 20.0. Resultados: la tasa de fiebre puerperal con doble antibiótico fue de 6.5 por ciento vs. 14.3 por ciento en el grupo control (p=0.085); la endometritis puerperal ocurrió en 4.34 por ciento vs. 9.89 por ciento (p=0.09); la infección de herida operatoria, ocurrió en un 2.17 por ciento vs. 3.29 por ciento, p=0.38 estas diferencias carecen de significación estadística. Conclusiones: el uso de azitromicina mas Cefazolina como profilaxis antibiótica para cesáreas de emergencia no. parece reducir de manera significativa las tasas de infección puerperal.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/administration & dosage , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section , Puerperal Infection/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination , Observational Study , Cohort Studies
12.
Botucatu; s.n; 2013. 56 p. ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-751557

ABSTRACT

Hemodiálise (HD) é modalidade de terapia renal substitutiva mais amplamente utilizada no mundo, sendo necessária a disponibilidade de acesso vascular adequado para sua realização. Atualmente, o número de cateteres venosos centrais (CVC) tem aumentado como forma de acesso vascular, paralelamente ao envelhecimento da população em diálise e presença de comorbidades como diabetes mellitus. Apesar da vantagem de obtenção imediata de acesso, a forte associação do CVC com infecções de corrente sanguínea (ICS) e consequente elevada morbi-mortalidade vem direcionando diversos estudos com a finalidade de prevenção dos eventos infecciosos relacionados ao uso de CVC na população em HD. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a eficácia do uso de antibioticoterapia em lock (gentamicina e cefazolina) na redução de ICS relacionada a cateteres tunelizados em pacientes em HD e identificar os efeitos adversos da lock terapia. Estudo prospectivo, não randomizado, realizado em dois centros para avaliação de lock terapia profilática em cateteres tunelizados nos pacientes em HD seguidos por 25 meses consecutivos e divididos em 2 grupos de acordo com o tipo de tratamento em lock prescrito e o serviço de HD de origem: grupo controle (GC=126 pacientes: heparina 5.000 UI/ml) e grupo intervenção (GI=107 pacientes: cefazolina 10mg/ml + gentamicina 5mg/ml + heparina 5000 UI/ml). Os dois grupos foram semelhantes quanto ao sexo, idade, doença de base, comorbidades, tempo em HD e sítio de implante de cateter. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos quanto à densidade de incidência de ICS (GI=0,57 eventos por 1000 cateteres-dia x GC=1,74, p=0.005), sobrevida livre de ICS (log-rank=17,62 no GI, p<0,0001) e número de dias com cateter (GC= 171 dias (79-256) x GI = 203 dias (111,5-326), p=0,015)...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis
13.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 983-989, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-99036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Relatively little is known on the microbiology, risk factors and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis in Korean children. We performed this study in order to evaluate the incidence, treatment and clinical outcomes of peritonitis in pediatric PD patients at Severance Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 57 PD patients younger than 18 years during the period between June 1, 1986 and December 31, 2011. The collected data included gender, age at commencement of PD, age at peritonitis, incidence of peritonitis, underlying causes of end stage renal disease, microbiology of peritonitis episodes, antibiotics sensitivity, modality and outcomes of PD. RESULTS: We found 56 episodes of peritonitis in 23 of the 57 PD patients (0.43 episodes/patient-year). Gram-positive bacteria were the most commonly isolated organisms (40 episodes, 71.4%). Peritonitis developed in 17 patients during the first 6 months following initiation of PD (73.9%). Peritonitis episodes rarely resulted in relapse or the need for permanent hemodialysis and no patient deaths were directly attributable to peritonitis. Antibiotic regimens included cefazolin+tobramycin from the years of 1986 to 2000 and cefazolin+ceftazidime from the years of 2001 to 2011. While antibiotic therapy was successful in 48 episodes (85.7%), the treatment was ineffective in 8 episodes (14.3%). The rate of continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) peritonitis was statistically higher than that of automated PD (APD) (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: Peritonitis was an important complication of PD therapy and we observed a higher incidence of PD peritonitis in patients with CAPD when compared to APD.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory/adverse effects , Peritonitis/drug therapy , Tobramycin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
14.
Arq. gastroenterol ; 49(4): 255-258, Oct.-Dec. 2012. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-660303

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Healthcare-associated infection represents the most frequent adverse event during care delivery. Medical advances like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy have brought improvement on quality of life to patients but an increased risk of healthcare-associated infection. Predictive risk factors for peristomal wound infection are largely unknown but evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies related to infection control may reduce infection rates. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate the global prevalence rate of peristomal infection. Secondary objectives were to characterise the positive culture results, to evaluate the prophylactic antibiotic protocol and to identify potential risk factors for peristomal infection. METHODS: Retrospective study of 297 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed at a general hospital between January 2004 and September 2010. Patients received prophylactic cefazolin before the endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, underling disease conditions to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and patient potential intrinsic risk factors. Statistical analysis was made with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 297 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes were inserted. Wound infection occurred in 36 patients (12.1%). Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant was the most frequently isolated microorganism (33.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.6%). The incidence rate had been rising each year and differ from 4.65% in 2004/2007 to 17.9% in 2008/2010. This finding was consistent with the increasing of prevalence global infection rates of the hospital. Most of the infections (55.6%) were detected in the first 10 days post procedure. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index values, mean survival time and duration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding between patients with and without periostomal infection. Institutional factors, namely global prevalence infection rates and the endemic character of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant, play an important role in peristomal infection rates. Traditional antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin is not adequate due to the prevalence of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Peristomal infection is a frequent problem with clinical impact in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients and should be considered a healthcare associated infection. The antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens using cephalosporins are not adequate and need to be reviewed due to the high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant and other resistant organisms in hospitals and nursing homes.


CONTEXTO: As infeções associadas aos cuidados de saúde constituem o mais frequente efeito adverso observado durante a prestação de cuidados de saúde. Os avanços clínicos como a gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea melhoraram a qualidade de vida dos doentes mas trouxeram um risco acrescido de infeções associadas aos cuidados de saúde. Os fatores de risco para a infecção peristomal são pouco conhecidos, mas a profilaxia antibiótica e outras estratégias profiláticas parecem reduzir a infeção peristomal. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo primário foi a avaliação global da taxa de infecção peristomal e a caracterização microbiológica dos agentes infetantes. Foram objetivos secundários a avaliação do protocolo de profilaxia antibiótica utilizado e a identificação de potenciais fatores de risco para a infeção peristomal. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospetivo em doentes submetidos a gastrostomia endoscópica entre janeiro de 2004 e setembro de 2010. Os doentes receberam profilaxia antibiótica com cefazolina antes do procedimento. Os processos clínicos foram revistos obtendo-se os dados demográficos, diagnóstico da doença subjacente e potenciais fatores de risco para infeção. A análise estatística foi feita com recurso ao programa SPSS 17.0. RESULTADOS: Foram gastrostomizados 297 doentes adultos. A infeção peristomal afetou 36 doentes (12,1%). O Staphylococcus aureus resistente à metacilina foi o micro-organismo mais frequentemente isolado (33,3%) seguido pela Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30,6%). A incidência de infeção peristomal aumentou progressivamente ao longo dos anos de 4,65% em 2004/2007 até 17,9% em 2008/2010. Este achado foi consistente com o crescimento global da infeção hospitalar. A maioria das infeções peristomais (55,6%) foi identificada nos primeiros 10 dias após a gastrostomia. Não encontramos diferenças significativas na prevalência da infeção peristomal relacionáveis com a idade, índice de massa corporal, sobrevida e duração da nutrição por gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea. Fatores institucionais, como a prevalência global da infeção hospitalar e o caráter endêmico do MRSA, são importantes na infeção peristomal e a profilaxia tradicional com cefazolina não é adequada num contexto de elevada prevalência de micro-organismos resistentes. CONCLUSÕES: A infeção peristomal é um problema frequente e clinicamente significativo que deve ser encarado como infeção associada aos cuidados de saúde. A profilaxia usando cefalosporinas pode não ser adequada e deve ser revista em hospitais e outras instituições com elevada prevalência de micro-organismos resistentes.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Surgical Stomas , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Gastrostomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Stomas/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
15.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 29(4): 395-400, ago. 2012. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-649826

ABSTRACT

Objective: to identify the risk factors for surgical site infections (SSI) in patients with surgical management fractures with internal fixation or prosthetic material. Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary institution in Armenia-Colombia in 2008 and 2009 in 223 patients. Results: The superficial incisional infection frequency was 9,4% (n: 21), and deep incisional infection was 7,6% (n: 17); there were no organ/space SSI.; the highest rates of infection were observed in patella fractures (50%), acromio-clavicular joint (25%), and femur (23,7%). The infections were caused by: S. aureus, Enterobactergergoviae y Enterobacteraerogenes. There was an association with clean-contaminated wounds compared to clean wounds (OR 2,2), comminuted fractures (OR 2,1) multiple fractures (OR 2,9) and patella surgery (OR 3,1). Conclusions: the severity of the fracture and the degree of contamination were predisposing factors to infection.


Objetivo: Identificar factores de riesgo para infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en pacientes con fracturas quirúrgicas de manejo con material de osteosíntesis o prótesis. Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal en una institución de tercer nivel de Armenia- Colombia en 2008 y 2009 en 223 pacientes. Resultados: La frecuencia de infección incisional superficial fue de 9,4% (n: 21), y de incisional profunda 7,6% (n: 17); no hubo infecciones de órgano/espacio; las mayores frecuencias de infección se observaron en fracturas de rótula (50%), articulación acromio- clavicular (25%) y fémur (23,7%). La etiología infecciosa fue por: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter gergoviae y Enterobacter aerogenes. Se encontró asociación con heridas limpia-contaminadas comparadas con heridas limpias (OR 2,2), fracturas conminutas (OR 2,1), fracturas múltiples (OR 2,9), y cirugía de rótula (OR 3,1). Conclusiones: La gravedad de la fractura y el grado de contaminación se evidenciaron como predisponentes para infección.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Colombia/epidemiology , Infection Control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
16.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-647304

ABSTRACT

Introdução: Infecções cirúrgicas são o segundo tipo mais frequente de infecção relacionada à assistência de saúde e tem sua incidência reduzida com a administração de antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizado estudo transversal, de 01 de março a 30 de abril de 2010, observando-se a adequação do uso da cefazolina na profilaxia cirúrgica. A adequação foi avaliada conforme: 1. O tempo da primeira dose, 2. A dose utilizada, 3. Doses adicionais durante a cirurgia e 4. O tempo de manutenção do antimicrobiano após o procedimento. Resultados: Foram avaliadas 264 cirurgias com uso de cefazolina como antibioticoprofilaxia cirúrgica. Cirurgias limpas foram 85,6% da amostra, dessas 43,4% tinham implante de prótese. Todas as quatro etapas avaliadas estavam adequadas em 33,7% das cirurgias, e todas as etapas foram inadequadas em 2,3% das cirurgias. O tempo para a primeira dose estava correto em 66,3% dos procedimentos. Apenas um paciente teve administrada dose inadequada do antibiótico. Das cirurgias com mais de 3h de duração, em 46,5% foram realizadas doses adicionais da cefazolina. Quarenta e oito por cento dos pacientes receberam o antimicrobiano por mais de 24h. Em 6,1% destes pacientes foi feito o diagnóstico de infecção associada ao procedimento cirúrgico. Conclusão: Há uma baixa taxa de adequação da profilaxia cirúrgica com cefazolina no hospital. É necessária uma padronização desta profilaxia, com a instituição de um protocolo assistencial visando uniformizar as condutas para a prevenção da infecção de sítio cirúrgico no HCPA.


Aims: Surgical site infections are the second most frequent cause of healthcare associated infections, and their incidence is reduced with the administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2010, evaluated adequacy and timeliness of cefazolin administration as surgical prophylaxis. Adequacy parameters were: (1) time to first dose; (2) cefazolin dose infused; (3) additional dose during surgery; and (4) duration of antimicrobial therapy after surgery. Results: Of a total of 264 surgeries evaluated, 85.6% were classified as clean, and prostheses were implanted in 43.4%. All steps of antimicrobial prophylaxis were adequate in 33.7% of the surgeries, and all steps were inadequate in 2.3%. Time to first dose was correct in 66.3% of the cases. Only one patient received an inadequate dose of the antimicrobial. Additional doses of cefazolin were administered in 46.5% of the surgeries that lasted more than 3 hours, and 48% of the patients received antimicrobial therapy for more than 24 hours. Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 6.1% of the patients. Conclusion: The rate of adequacy of surgical prophylaxis in the hospital was low. Standardized protocols and practices should be established to ensure adequate prevention of surgical site Infection in hospitals.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cross-Sectional Studies
17.
Arch. venez. farmacol. ter ; 31(3): 67-71, 2012. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-699602

ABSTRACT

Toda intervención quirúrgica está expuesta a infectarse. La necesidad de profilaxis antimicrobiana en cirugía ortopédica para casos quirúrgicos agudos o electivas de cirugías limpias ha sido establecida como procedimiento de rutina. En Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología cuando se requiere el uso de implantes metálicos con el fin de realizar osteosíntesis o sustitución de las superficies articulares, aumenta el riesgo de infección, por tratarse de materiales extraños que son introducidos en el organismo. En estos casos la antibióticoterapia preventiva es de primordial importancia. Se realizó un estudio de profilaxis antimicrobiana, multicéntrico, aleatorizado, prospectivo, doble ciego, comparativo de grupos paralelos, con el fin de evaluar la eficacia de Cefadroxilo I.V. Vs. Cefazolina I.V. como antibióticos profilácticos mediante la determinación del número de pacientes infectados en cirugía de fracturas cerradas en la cuales se colocó material de síntesis. Se completaron 58 pacientes, 34 en el grupo de cefadroxilo y 24 en el grupo de cefazolina, al inicio los grupos fueron similares en cuanto a edad, sexo, tipo de fractura, tiempo de intervención, tiempo entre la fractura y la intervención.Más pacientes en el grupo de cefadroxilo tenían el tiempo máximo autorizado entre la fractura y la intervención (p: 0,07). Se presentó en el grupo de cefadroxilo una infección de la herida operatoria y un caso de eritema leve que cedió con tratamiento oral con cefadroxilo, sin diferencias entre los grupos.Hubo tres casos de eventos adversos, reacción anafiláctica a las 48 horas en el grupo de cefazolina que ameritó finalización de protocolo y hematoma en miembro inferior derecho y, en el grupo de cefadroxilo, una elevación discreta de enzimas hepáticas. La respuesta terapéutica de profilaxis antimicrobianano mostró diferencia entre los grupos. El cefadroxilo es tan eficaz como la cefazolina para la profilaxis antimicrobiana en pacientes con fracturas...


Any operation is exposed to infection. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery for acute or elective surgical cases of clean surgery is established as a routine procedure. Orthopedic Surgery when required the use of metallic implants in order to perform internal fixation or replacement of the articular surfaces, increases the risk of infection because they are foreign materials are introduced into the body. In these cases, preventive antibiotic therapy is very important. We performed a study of antimicrobialprophylaxis multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel group comparison in order to evaluate the effectiveness of Cefadroxil IV vs. Cefazolin I.V. as prophylactic antibiotics by determining the number of infected patients after fracture surgery in which synthetic material was placed. Fifty eigth patients were completed, 34 in the cefadroxil group and 24 in the cefazolin group, at the beginning the groups were similar in age, sex, fracture type, operative time, time between fracture and surgery. More patients in the cefadroxil group had the maximum allo-wable time between the fracture and surgery. (P: 0.07). In the cefadroxil group we found a wound infection and one case of mild erythema which resolved with oral treatment with cefadroxil, without differences between groups. There were three cases of adverse events, anaphylactic reaction to cefazolin at 48 h in the group that required finalization of protocol and hematoma in right leg and in the cefadroxil group, a moderate increase in liver enzymes. The therapeutic response of antimicrobial prophylaxis showed no difference between groups. Cefadroxil is as effective as cefazolin for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with fractures that warrant placement of synthetic material


Subject(s)
Female , Cefadroxil/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Orthopedics/methods , Products with Antimicrobial Action , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods
18.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 74(6): 441-443, nov.-dez. 2011. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-613446

ABSTRACT

A canaliculite lacrimal é uma afecção rara, cujo principal agente etiológico é o Actinomyces israelii. Ela deve ser considerada como um diagnóstico diferencial nos casos de conjuntivite crônica recorrente. O objetivo deste estudo é relatar 3 casos de pacientes com canaliculite crônica supurativa e diferentes formas de tratamentos. O primeiro paciente apresentou uma canaliculite superior esquerda e foi tratado com uma canaliculotomia. Entretanto, o mesmo desenvolveu uma canaliculite inferior ipsilateral após 6 meses e foi submetido a um esquema de injeção intracanalicular de cefazolina fortificada com resultado satisfatório. O segundo paciente apresentou uma canaliculite inferior esquerda e foi tratado com uma canaliculotomia. O terceiro paciente teve uma canaliculite inferior esquerda e foi submetido a um esquema de injeção intracanalicular de cefazolina fortificada. Ambos obtiveram completa resolução dos sintomas e sinais. O presente estudo demonstra que a irrigação intracanalicular de cefazolina fortificada pode ser uma forma útil de tratamento de canaliculite crônica supurativa com sintomatologia mais branda. O maior benefício desta abordagem é evitar o traumatismo cirúrgico da canaliculotomia.


Lacrimal canaliculitis is a rare disease caused mainly by Actinomyces israelii. It should be regarded as a differential diagnosis of recurrent chronic conjunctivitis. The purpose of this study was to report 3 cases of chronic suppurative canaliculitis and different treatment options. The first patient presented with an upper left canaliculitis and was treated with a canaliculotomy. Nevertheless, he had an ipsilateral lower canaliculitis after 6 months and underwent intracanalicular injections of fortified cefazolin with complete remission. The second patient presented with a lower left canaliculitis and underwent a canaliculotomy. The third patient had a lower left canaliculitis and underwent intracanalicular injections of fortified cefazolin. Both achieved complete remission. The present article demonstrated that intracanalicular irrigation of fortified cefazolin may be a helpful treatment of chronic suppurative canaliculitis with mild symptoms and signs. The most important benefit of this approach is to avoid injury to the lacrimal canaliculus.


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Dacryocystitis/therapy , Actinomyces/enzymology , Combined Modality Therapy , Dacryocystitis/microbiology
19.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 31(4): 319-323, oct.-dic. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-613792

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Determinar si el uso de Cefazolina como profilaxis antibiótica produce una disminución significativa de las infecciones en pacientes cirróticos con sangrado digestivo, comparado con Ciprofloxacino. Material y MétodoS: Ensayo Clínico aleatorizado. Se incluyeron a pacientes cirróticos mayores de 18 años, con sangrado digestivo, que ingresaron entre Julio del 2008 a julio del 2010 a la Unidad de hemorragia Digestiva del HNERM, sin evidencia clínica ni de laboratorio de infección al momento del ingreso y que no hubieran recibido tratamiento antibióticolas últimas 2 semanas. A un grupo se le administró Ciprofloxacino 200 mg bid EV y al otro Cefazolina 1 g tid EV.x 7 dias. RESULTADOS: Fueron incluidos 98 pacientes, 53 pacientes en el grupo de Cefazolina y 45 en el grupo de Ciprofloxacino. El promedio de edad fue 66 +/- 10 años, 61 % varones; 59,2 % tuvieron ascitis, la frecuencia de infecciones en la población total fue de 14,3% (14/98). El resangrado fue 8,1% y la mortalidad general 4,1%. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en relación a edad, sexo, estadio Child, ascitis, encefalopatía, ni en promedio de Bilirrubina, TP, Creatinina y niveles de Albúmina. El grupo que usó Cefazolina tuvo 11,3 % de infecciones, comparado con el 17,8% de infecciones en el grupo que recibió Ciprofloxacino (p= 0,398) IC 95%. Cuando se excluyó del análisis los pacientes cirróticos Child A y aquellos sin ascitis, se encontró: 22,2 % de infecciones en el grupo de cefazolina y 26,9 % en el grupo de Ciprofloxacino (p=0,757 IC 95%).


AIM: To determine if prophylaxis with cefazolin produces a significant reduction in infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding when compared with ciprofloxacin. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial. Patients 18 years or older with diagnosis of cirrhosis, gastrointestinal bleeding and no clinical or laboratory evidence of infection who were admitted to the gastrointestinal bleeding unit of HNERM between July 2008 and July 2010 were included. Patients were allocated to receive either i.v. ciprofloxacin 200 mg bid or i.v. cefazolin 1 gm tid for 7 days. RESULTS: 98 patients were included, 53 in the cefazolin group and 45 in the ciprofloxacinone. Age average was 66 +/- 10 years, 61% were male, 59,2% had ascites. Overall rate of infections was 14,3% (14/98). Rebleeding rate was 8,1% and mortality 4,1%. There were nodifferences in age, sex, Child Pugh score, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy nor in billirubin, albumin, PT and creatinine levels between the study groups. Infection rate in the cefazolin groups was 11,3% while in the ciprofloxacin one 17,8% (p=0,398). When Child-Pugh A and patients without ascites were excluded of the analysis, the cefalozin group had 22,2% of infections and 26,9% in the ciprofloxacin one (p=0,757).


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Fibrosis/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy
20.
Rev. chil. cir ; 63(2): 186-190, abr. 2011. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-582970

ABSTRACT

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis has been questioned in the inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh. The aim of this paper is to give account of the efficiency of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in the prevention of wound infection in the elective inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh under local anaesthesia in an ambulatory basis. In the present observacional analytic study, 955 patients were operated upon with a mesh technique during a 10 year period, .in the CRS Hernia Centre in Santiago. In the first group of 250 patients, lgr Cefazolin® was administered iv one hour before the operation, in the second group of 710 patients no antibiotics were used. Demographic variables, associated diseases, the length of surgery were comparable in both groups. The same team of surgeons work in both groups. Wound infection was defined as the presence of pus in the surgical wound associated with a positive bacterial culture. The rate of wound infections was 1.05 percent of the first and 0.35 percent of the second group. This difference was no significant (p < 0.08). The isolated germ was a Staphylo-coccus aureus in all cases. The treatment was ambulatory in all cases. The rate of haematoma and funiculo-testicular fluxion were low. We conclude that the rate of wound infection in mesh herniorrhaphies is low and that the antibiotic prophylaxis does not improve these results. Its routine use in these patients is not justified.


Introducción: El uso de la profilaxis antibiótica en la cirugía hemiaria con malla es controversial. El propósito del presente estudio es establecer la efectividad de la profilaxis antibiótica (PA) en la prevención de la infección del sitio operatorio (ISO) en la herniorrafía con malla efectuada en forma ambulatoria con anestesia local. Material y Método: El estudio observacional analítico se realizó dentro del Programa de Cirugía Ambulatoria del CRS Cordillera, en dos grupos consecutivos de pacientes, el primero que se sometió a PA mediante lgr de Cefazolina® intravenosa, inmediatamente antes del procedimiento quirúrgico, y el segundo en el que se prescindió de ella. Los controles postoperatorios se efectuaron al 7º y 30º día por un cirujano del grupo. Se diagnosticó ISO con la presencia de exudado purulento, con cultivo bacteriano positivo. Resultados: El estudio se efectuó en 955 pacientes operados entre 1998 y 2008. En el primer grupo, constituido por 245 pacientes se usó PA, en el segundo grupo de 710 pacientes se prescindió de ella. Las variables demográficas, antecedentes mórbidos y la duración del acto quirúrgico fueron comparables en ambos grupos. Se registraron 2 casos de infección en el primer grupo (1,05 por ciento) y dos en el segundo (0,35). Esta diferencia no fue significativa. El germen aislado fue en todos los casos el estafilococo dorado. Conclusiones: La tasa ISO en la hemiorrafia inguinal electiva ambulatoria con malla es baja y no se modificó con el uso de PA. Su empleo indiscriminado no aparece justificado en estos pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Mesh , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia, Local , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Observational Studies as Topic , Postoperative Complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL